[GiDlist] Re: GiDlist digest, Vol 1 #461 - 2 msgs

[Andrea Calaon]

Thanks for the replay and the suggestions!
Andres Peratta told me as well to use "onlyincond", but I forgot
to put it in the file I sent you.
I will try to use always the names of the conditions, as you said,
is easier to manage the problem type (it has grown a lot).

I wish you a nice day,
Andrea


On 4 Sep 2003 at 12:00, gidlist-request at gatxan.cimne.upc.es wrote:

Message: 1
From: "Enrique Escolano" escolano at cimne.upc.es
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Subject: Re: [GiDlist] Some coupling between Remove and cond?
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:52:42 +0200
Reply-To: gidlist at gid.cimne.upc.es

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01CD_01C3724C.8DEAC480
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is a GiD bug with a internal cache to speed the write calculation =
file procedure. It's corrected for the next version.

A detail: instead to use
*loop elems
must use
*loop elems *onlyincond
because a loop over all selected elements not necessary has the related =
condition fields: *if(strcmp(cond(1),"Linear")=3D=3D0)

Another detail: it's more easy to mantain a problemtype using fielnames =
instead fieldnumbers=20
instead cond(1) use for example cond(quadratic)

Enrique Escolano




Andrea Calaon

Ashurst Lodge, Ashurst
Southampton, Hampshire
SO40 7AA, UK
Tel. office: +44 23 80 293 223
Fax office: +44 23 80 292 853
Mobile: +44 7766 488 225
E-mail: andrea at beasy.com