Hello,
Is there a way to save a boundary condition setup, similar to what is possible for materials?
Thanks
/Jonas
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listas.cimne.upc.edu/pipermail/gidlist/attachments/20030703/d54ed409/attachment.htm
[GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Moderator: GiD Team
-
Enrique Escolano
[GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
It has not sense to save a GiD condition in a database, because the contition field values are different for each
assignation to an entity. In other hand, a GiD material has usually constant values.
Enrique Escolano
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonas Forssell
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Hello,
Is there a way to save a boundary condition setup, similar to what is possible for materials?
Thanks
/Jonas
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listas.cimne.upc.edu/pipermail/gidlist/attachments/20030703/b37ea01f/attachment.htm
assignation to an entity. In other hand, a GiD material has usually constant values.
Enrique Escolano
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonas Forssell
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Hello,
Is there a way to save a boundary condition setup, similar to what is possible for materials?
Thanks
/Jonas
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listas.cimne.upc.edu/pipermail/gidlist/attachments/20030703/b37ea01f/attachment.htm
-
Jonas Forssell
[GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
The reason I am asking is because I have found that by
defining many parameters as conditions (although they
are things like elemement number of integration
points, parameters etc), I can define and assign all
the data I want to the model and get an excellent
output file.
You can see the thinking if you download the GID
preprocessor interface to my program from
http://impact.sourceforge.net
I dabbled with the Idea of using materials instead but
there can only be one material per element while there
can be several conditions per element.
The problem is that once I have defined a "condition"
and assigned it to an element, my settings get erased.
Thanks
/Jonas
--- Enrique Escolano escolano at cimne.upc.es skrev:
It has not sense to save a GiD condition in a
database, because the contition field values are
different for each
assignation to an entity. In other hand, a GiD
material has usually constant values.
Enrique Escolano
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonas Forssell
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Hello,
Is there a way to save a boundary condition setup,
similar to what is possible for materials?
Thanks
/Jonas
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid
med Yahoo! Express
_____________________________________________________
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
Se mer på: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html
defining many parameters as conditions (although they
are things like elemement number of integration
points, parameters etc), I can define and assign all
the data I want to the model and get an excellent
output file.
You can see the thinking if you download the GID
preprocessor interface to my program from
http://impact.sourceforge.net
I dabbled with the Idea of using materials instead but
there can only be one material per element while there
can be several conditions per element.
The problem is that once I have defined a "condition"
and assigned it to an element, my settings get erased.
Thanks
/Jonas
--- Enrique Escolano escolano at cimne.upc.es skrev:
It has not sense to save a GiD condition in a
database, because the contition field values are
different for each
assignation to an entity. In other hand, a GiD
material has usually constant values.
Enrique Escolano
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonas Forssell
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Hello,
Is there a way to save a boundary condition setup,
similar to what is possible for materials?
Thanks
/Jonas
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid
med Yahoo! Express
_____________________________________________________
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
Se mer på: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html
-
Enrique Escolano
[GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
It is possible to define a field #MAT# inside a condition or material. This
field point to a material name (it's automatically updated with the current
materials).
You can group some "shared" values of a condition in a GiD material, and
point it. This "special" materials can be locaded in another book.
Download the problemtype nastran2. It's a good sample using this #MAT# field
(some materials of a book named "PROPERTIES" point to materials of another
book named "MATERIAL")
Can download nastran2 from GiD (menu Data-Problemtype-Internet
Retrieve...)
or from this web page: http://www.compassis.com
Enrique
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonas Forssell" jonasforssell at yahoo.se
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
The reason I am asking is because I have found that by
defining many parameters as conditions (although they
are things like elemement number of integration
points, parameters etc), I can define and assign all
the data I want to the model and get an excellent
output file.
You can see the thinking if you download the GID
preprocessor interface to my program from
http://impact.sourceforge.net
I dabbled with the Idea of using materials instead but
there can only be one material per element while there
can be several conditions per element.
The problem is that once I have defined a "condition"
and assigned it to an element, my settings get erased.
Thanks
/Jonas
--- Enrique Escolano escolano at cimne.upc.es skrev:
It has not sense to save a GiD condition in a
database, because the contition field values are
different for each
assignation to an entity. In other hand, a GiD
material has usually constant values.
Enrique Escolano
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonas Forssell
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Hello,
Is there a way to save a boundary condition setup,
similar to what is possible for materials?
Thanks
/Jonas
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid
med Yahoo! Express
_____________________________________________________
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
Se mer på: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html
_______________________________________________
GiDlist mailing list
GiDlist at gid.cimne.upc.es
http://gid.cimne.upc.es/mailman/listinfo/gidlist
field point to a material name (it's automatically updated with the current
materials).
You can group some "shared" values of a condition in a GiD material, and
point it. This "special" materials can be locaded in another book.
Download the problemtype nastran2. It's a good sample using this #MAT# field
(some materials of a book named "PROPERTIES" point to materials of another
book named "MATERIAL")
Can download nastran2 from GiD (menu Data-Problemtype-Internet
Retrieve...)
or from this web page: http://www.compassis.com
Enrique
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonas Forssell" jonasforssell at yahoo.se
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
The reason I am asking is because I have found that by
defining many parameters as conditions (although they
are things like elemement number of integration
points, parameters etc), I can define and assign all
the data I want to the model and get an excellent
output file.
You can see the thinking if you download the GID
preprocessor interface to my program from
http://impact.sourceforge.net
I dabbled with the Idea of using materials instead but
there can only be one material per element while there
can be several conditions per element.
The problem is that once I have defined a "condition"
and assigned it to an element, my settings get erased.
Thanks
/Jonas
--- Enrique Escolano escolano at cimne.upc.es skrev:
It has not sense to save a GiD condition in a
database, because the contition field values are
different for each
assignation to an entity. In other hand, a GiD
material has usually constant values.
Enrique Escolano
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonas Forssell
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Hello,
Is there a way to save a boundary condition setup,
similar to what is possible for materials?
Thanks
/Jonas
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid
med Yahoo! Express
_____________________________________________________
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
Se mer på: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html
_______________________________________________
GiDlist mailing list
GiDlist at gid.cimne.upc.es
http://gid.cimne.upc.es/mailman/listinfo/gidlist
-
Jonas Forssell
[GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Thanks Enrique,
Excellent workaround! I'll use that one from now on.
For the authors of GID, I'd like to propose saveable conditions as a possible future feature to an otherwise very nice software.
Thanks
/Jonas
Enrique Escolano escolano at cimne.upc.es wrote:
It is possible to define a field #MAT# inside a condition or material. This
field point to a material name (it's automatically updated with the current
materials).
You can group some "shared" values of a condition in a GiD material, and
point it. This "special" materials can be locaded in another book.
Download the problemtype nastran2. It's a good sample using this #MAT# field
(some materials of a book named "PROPERTIES" point to materials of another
book named "MATERIAL")
Can download nastran2 from GiD (menu Data-Problemtype-Internet
Retrieve...)
or from this web page: http://www.compassis.com
Enrique
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonas Forssell"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
The reason I am asking is because I have found that by
defining many parameters as conditions (although they
are things like elemement number of integration
points, parameters etc), I can define and assign all
the data I want to the model and get an excellent
output file.
You can see the thinking if you download the GID
preprocessor interface to my program from
http://impact.sourceforge.net
I dabbled with the Idea of using materials instead but
there can only be one material per element while there
can be several conditions per element.
The problem is that once I have defined a "condition"
and assigned it to an element, my settings get erased.
Thanks
/Jonas
--- Enrique Escolano skrev:
It has not sense to save a GiD condition in a
database, because the contition field values are
different for each
assignation to an entity. In other hand, a GiD
material has usually constant values.
Enrique Escolano
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonas Forssell
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Hello,
Is there a way to save a boundary condition setup,
similar to what is possible for materials?
Thanks
/Jonas
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid
med Yahoo! Express
_____________________________________________________
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
Se mer på: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html
_______________________________________________
GiDlist mailing list
GiDlist at gid.cimne.upc.es
http://gid.cimne.upc.es/mailman/listinfo/gidlist
_______________________________________________
GiDlist mailing list
GiDlist at gid.cimne.upc.es
http://gid.cimne.upc.es/mailman/listinfo/gidlist
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listas.cimne.upc.edu/pipermail/gidlist/attachments/20030717/1b7cc950/attachment.htm
Excellent workaround! I'll use that one from now on.
For the authors of GID, I'd like to propose saveable conditions as a possible future feature to an otherwise very nice software.
Thanks
/Jonas
Enrique Escolano escolano at cimne.upc.es wrote:
It is possible to define a field #MAT# inside a condition or material. This
field point to a material name (it's automatically updated with the current
materials).
You can group some "shared" values of a condition in a GiD material, and
point it. This "special" materials can be locaded in another book.
Download the problemtype nastran2. It's a good sample using this #MAT# field
(some materials of a book named "PROPERTIES" point to materials of another
book named "MATERIAL")
Can download nastran2 from GiD (menu Data-Problemtype-Internet
Retrieve...)
or from this web page: http://www.compassis.com
Enrique
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonas Forssell"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
The reason I am asking is because I have found that by
defining many parameters as conditions (although they
are things like elemement number of integration
points, parameters etc), I can define and assign all
the data I want to the model and get an excellent
output file.
You can see the thinking if you download the GID
preprocessor interface to my program from
http://impact.sourceforge.net
I dabbled with the Idea of using materials instead but
there can only be one material per element while there
can be several conditions per element.
The problem is that once I have defined a "condition"
and assigned it to an element, my settings get erased.
Thanks
/Jonas
--- Enrique Escolano skrev:
It has not sense to save a GiD condition in a
database, because the contition field values are
different for each
assignation to an entity. In other hand, a GiD
material has usually constant values.
Enrique Escolano
----- Original Message -----
From: Jonas Forssell
To: gidlist at gatxan.cimne.upc.es
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: [GiDlist] Saving boundary conditions
Hello,
Is there a way to save a boundary condition setup,
similar to what is possible for materials?
Thanks
/Jonas
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid
med Yahoo! Express
_____________________________________________________
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
Se mer på: http://se.docs.yahoo.com/info/express/help/index.html
_______________________________________________
GiDlist mailing list
GiDlist at gid.cimne.upc.es
http://gid.cimne.upc.es/mailman/listinfo/gidlist
_______________________________________________
GiDlist mailing list
GiDlist at gid.cimne.upc.es
http://gid.cimne.upc.es/mailman/listinfo/gidlist
Gå före i kön och få din sajt värderad på nolltid med Yahoo! Express
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listas.cimne.upc.edu/pipermail/gidlist/attachments/20030717/1b7cc950/attachment.htm